On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 04:13:37AM -0400, Matthew Mondor wrote: > > I believe the situation with both mfs and lfs is that some pieces of > > the support are in place but not others. It was clear when hacking up > > the code that neither had actually been tried by anyone in a long, > > long time... > > I admit myself not having tried LFS again after the advent of WAPBL, > and only having used MFS to boot small custom userlands using > crunchgen(1) long ago (floppy disks :)
Longer than that. I mean more like since CSRG :-) (and I meant lfs or mfs with quotas) -- David A. Holland [email protected]
