> Let me get on the record. It's basically ridiculous to allow GCC 4.8 > to redefine the set of permitted C expressions such that it breaks > BSD.
gcc 4.8 isn't. C99 did; what's distinctive about gcc 4.8 is that before that gcc didn't take advantage of the leeway C99 said it had. These macros have been out-of-spec since the day NetBSD decided it was going to use C99 rather than some older version of C; it's just that only now is that out-of-spec-ness actually biting anyone. (That decision may have been implicit in a compiler version change.) /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
