On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Matt Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Dec 9, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Ryota Ozaki <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:19:52AM +0900, Ryota Ozaki wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Thor Lancelot Simon <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you try increasing HZ? >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for the suggestion. Which HZ is good for the purpose? >>>>> 1000 was not good for my environment (KVM for now) and I'm trying >>>>> other HZ (500, 200, etc.). >>>> >>>> I couldn't get good results on this approach... >>> >>> It may be poorly suited to virtualized platforms. >> >> Okay, I'll try it on a physical machine. >> >> BTW, could you tell me how increasing HZ affects vioif and softint? > > If you have __HAVE_FAST_SOFTINTS it shouldn't affect it at all.
Thanks. My target is x86 for now... ozaki-r
