On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Ryota Ozaki <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Masao Uebayashi <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Ryota Ozaki <[email protected]> wrote: >>> In the case of softint-ed interrupts on, I think we can safely >>> remove the indirection. OTOH, in the case of off, I'm not sure >>> we can do the same thing. >> >> As far as you don't break other virtio(4) drivers than vioif(4)... > > The patch doesn't change other drivers' behavior though, I'll check if > the change affects the other virtio drivers. (I hope they're well isolated.)
My code inspection and tests under disk/net io loads don't show any problems at this point. Though, I fixed a bug in the case of SOFTINT_INTR && MPSAFE_NET :-/ Here is a updated patch: http://www.netbsd.org/~ozaki-r/vioif-softint-intr.diff ozaki-r
