In article <20150317112415.4125617f...@rebar.astron.com>, Christos Zoulas <chris...@zoulas.com> wrote: >On Mar 17, 9:56am, mar...@duskware.de (Martin Husemann) wrote: >-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/common/bootimage > >| No, you should not randomly add the expensive ptyfs code to INSTALL kernels >| you can not test yourself. Everything else above is fine, as long as sysinst >| is silent on ptyfs failure when the compat ipty nodes are available. > >Can you please state the criteria that make you say that ptyfs is expensive? > >The size of the ptyfs kernel module (amd64) >text data bss dec hex filename >10001 328 0 10329 2859 ptyfs.kmod > >The sizes of the install kernels between releases (amd64 again): > >text data bss dec hex filename >10185579 5693216 781728 16660523 fe382b netbsd-5.2.3-INSTALL >11234409 5724168 623712 17582289 10c48d1 netbsd-6.1.5-INSTALL > >We can do the same with whichever kernel you want.
For example sun2: text data bss dec hex filename 1073288 26968 201900 1302156 13de8c netbsd-5.2.3-INSTALL 1195647 37148 86296 1319091 1420b3 netbsd-6.1.5-INSTALL christos