On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:53:16AM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote: >Can you please state the criteria that make you say that ptyfs is expensive?
Ok, I take that back, I completely misremembered: As you say, it is like 10kb of code (9.5 on VAX), plus some runtime data structures. And actually on the CD image, I flipped it over to *USE* ptyfs in the end, as that avoids another tmpfs instance, which was way more expensive. And the scripts deal with both variants already. Martin
