On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 06:26:14PM +0900, Kengo NAKAHARA wrote: > Of course, m_tag_get() is used by packet processing path, this overhead > would have a certain influence on packet throughput and latency. > So, I think m_tag should use a dedicated pool cache like mbuf to call > pool_cache_get() directly.
Which tags are you actually seeing allocated? It would be better to remove the tags in first place if they are hot enough... Joerg
