On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 01:25:36PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> We don't have that many random consumers of tags in the tree. For the
> hot cases, it makes a lot more sense to put a field or two into the mbuf
> packet header -- if more data is needed, a specific pool is needed
> anyway.
I think a hot case is PACKET_TAG_VLAN. If you're using VLANs, you'll
have one per packet going in or out. It's 16 bits so it could easily fit
in the mbuf header.
--
Manuel Bouyer <bou...@antioche.eu.org>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--
