On Mon, 1 Aug 2016, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > I disagree. While it is nice to assert this property in the pmap, it is > the wrong place. First of all, all pmaps need to be audited, at least on > platforms with shared address space. It's not specific to x86. Second, > part of the problem is that UVM does not handle its own constraints > correctly. That means it is possible that some of the (then failing) > requests could be fulfilled by correct code. In short, handling it in > the pmap doesn't actually solve the problem completely either.
I don't understand. If you can't enter the mapping into the TLB, who cares what UVM does? Eduardo
