On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:53:18PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote: > What's more interesting to me is to know just how many long names people > are seeing which are currently excluded from the cache, and would benefit > from the change - that is, what percentage of all lookups fail in the > cache for that reason, and do we have a histogram of the longer lengths > with their frequencies (that is, would simply making the cutoff a little > bigger improve things without requiring mem allocation to be added).
The goal is to not arbitrarily exclude names from the cache at all, because fexecve is causing rumbles about doing significantly more reverse lookups. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
