On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 07:49:54PM -0400, Mouse wrote: > > [...], because fexecve is causing rumbles about doing significantly > > more reverse lookups. > > Why is everyone so concerned about finding "the" name of an inode, or > indeed any name for an inode? As far as I can tell there has never > been any promise that any given inode has any names pointing to it, at > least not unless it's got no other references to it (in which case it > would be freed if it had no names). > > Given the list of smart people I've seen discussing this, I'm > presumably just missing something, but what?
Loonix. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org