On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 05:40:59PM +0100, J. Hannken-Illjes wrote:

> > On 5. Mar 2020, at 23:48, Andrew Doran <a...@netbsd.org> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'd like to merge the changes on the ad-namecache branch, and would
> > appreciate any code review.  The motivation for these changes is, as
> > you might guess, performance.  I put an overview below.  I won't be
> > merging this for a couple of weeks in any case.
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > vfs_vnode.c:
> > 
> >     Namecache related changes, and the change to not block new vnode
> >     references across VOP_INACTIVE() mentioned on tech-kern.  I don't
> >     think this blocking is needed at least for well behaved FSes like
> >     ffs & tmpfs.
> 
> I suppose this blocking is no longer needed.  It originates from
> the early steps to clean up the vnode lifecycle.  If anything
> goes wrong it is quite simple to undo this change.
> 
> Blocking further references should only be needed for vrecycle().
> 
> We have to terminate vrelel() early if we got new references,
> diff attached.

I was wondering about the same the other day.  Changes applied, thank you!

Andrew

Reply via email to