Hi, On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 04:54:00PM +0900, Takashi YAMAMOTO wrote: > On Thu, Jul 2, 2026 at 4:04 AM Reinoud Zandijk <[email protected]> wrote: > > as part of a compressed ram experiment I'd like to try, I've first cleaned > > up > > the current uvm swap support for I noticed that the support for encrypted > > swap > > became distributed and not logical anymore. In the attached patch I've > > contracted the encrypted support into the /dev/drum device and removed it > > from > > the specific swap support and callbacks. > > with the cost of an extra allocation for the common case? > (just a question)
That should be patched in v2. With regards, Reinoud
