On Thu, Jul 2, 2026 at 7:22 PM Reinoud Zandijk <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 04:54:00PM +0900, Takashi YAMAMOTO wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2026 at 4:04 AM Reinoud Zandijk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > as part of a compressed ram experiment I'd like to try, I've first > > > cleaned up > > > the current uvm swap support for I noticed that the support for encrypted > > > swap > > > became distributed and not logical anymore. In the attached patch I've > > > contracted the encrypted support into the /dev/drum device and removed it > > > from > > > the specific swap support and callbacks. > > > > with the cost of an extra allocation for the common case? > > (just a question) > > That should be patched in v2.
i meant getiobuf in swstrategy. v2 looks same. > > With regards, > Reinoud >
