Yeah, I will try to improve the code efficiency. 2016-07-27 10:14 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas <chris...@zoulas.com>:
> On Jul 27, 8:23am, charles.cui1...@gmail.com (Charles Cui) wrote: > -- Subject: Re: updates? > > | 3. there will be a concern if we count the number of signals each time, > | but this sigcnts logic may can be merged with siggetinfo. > > Can you try doing that? > > | 2. I can add kassert around ret. > | 1. I know sp cannot be NULL, and if it is NULL, the sigcnt is zero, what > do > | you mean of code would die (which piece of code)? > > I mean the code that unconditionally deleted the signal from the set. > > christos >
