At Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:45:19 +0100, Joachim Strömbergson wrote: > Rob Austein wrote: > > There was a discussion this morning about maybe including a jumper > > on the Alpha board controlling whether the CPU can talk to the MKM, > > so that the as-yet-unwritten MKM core doesn't become a blocking item. > > As you describe it, the initial MKM core doesn't sound all that > > complicated, so maybe this is a non-issue, OTOH one more jumper on a > > prototype board is (probably) harmless. > > Since the AVR can talk to the MKM and the CPU can talk to the AVR, would > a third electrical path really be necessary?
If it prevents us from having developers sitting idle while waiting for the MKM core, yes; otherwise, probably not. _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list Tech@cryptech.is https://lists.cryptech.is/listinfo/tech