-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Aloha!
Rob Austein wrote: > I'm not opposed to the more ambitious options Joachim proposed, just > trying to find the right balance. What I most want out of the > proposed revision is the ability to run the FPGA at 100MHz without > breaking the good TRNG we already have; if we can get an even better > TRNG and free up some resources, cool, but the issue that's really > in our faces at the moment is the clock speed restriction. Yes, exactly. I want to minimize the changes. Esp in the short term. And _only_ change the mixer. - -- Med vänlig hälsning, Yours Joachim Strömbergson - Assured AB ======================================================================== -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJatONJAAoJEF3cfFQkIuyNchsQANoaDujvRHhixyYIzjJm4J3r hyYw2FiSjhA6e96hk33yHWlsI8EXVpXb25VIfQrJnsmnJDKH8GTaFQM2iyYpFRxS JrqALjglvNzraSmtafyu/b1eCd+R7ioiMBjMYx2xm1ieyiA7Zs4uvAaplSeCtcY1 LvjXq9ddqKb0t85Fcxn4H8/cNd1nSJ5S/fGub+oof7QqN9Ga4sMf4ltjMrjJ3xFP R7qF359NPQjr/mnpj15XCLydMyiXganvfnhjYF7IvFwf2FPKnYdBC/WJZ7WwALoa P0yYYSDoHpsBs9j39+6QF2NZN8o8JnZownKMwAv3rfdvBd7DnEzs3NSesYIvz3Yi KN4gvdW7/YhiJ9bRzhQeJjzn+VysKgkVQCb7E9qybMTxoZT1wpdcXO533Cviopao pWKddGLv9+IqqnQQ587iqQ9WcUiCSuy3GLzWUy/0wOyGeLoiFxsFIG8gsApSZviV 76FeQA0UK9cdfHfU8TbEEtS14vlggHUo/FJPCkAgKpxlle8GCVqi/esgvGbeBZ3M QKSsafAH5MGyUktoGjXUoGKwMR5QwsfiqjQlnU+tqnnKZoQEX7mWF8zgCV3rMhU6 QocTokwzjLIHueWUwB/KU2TuRQZd2KZH+BVK7blbxhaZmfVWywbLT9pS/vvhwDOI 15nlHn5JWsFnqZz66RRD =D4ks -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list Tech@cryptech.is https://lists.cryptech.is/listinfo/tech
