-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Aloha!
Manuel Domke wrote: > I see there is a need to make it smaller/faster but I don't think its > a good option to "downgrade" to SHA-256. From the (long-term) > security perspective I'd prefer using SHA-3 (Keccak-1600) instead of > SHA-2, like its done in my favorite entropy source - the Infinite > Noise TRNG - but whitening is fully implemented in software. > > Maybe Blake2s is a good option to go for now? Especially when you > have an (partial) implementation. Its also been an SHA-3 finalist > just like the winner Keccak-1600. Cryptech has a SHA-3 core and could be used here. https://trac.cryptech.is/wiki/GitRepositories/core/hash/sha3 The interface is a bit different, but could be adapted. Thanks for the suggestions and feedback. - -- Med vänlig hälsning, Yours Joachim Strömbergson - Assured AB ======================================================================== -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJatOgHAAoJEF3cfFQkIuyNzMAQAINFQXRCm28JacZ2OocqQvlV D8/csS3alIcxzFbzzBW1Mj+11W6VMi9ucvgXmPlEKl2dHwDz6x2dO6XjfYISpQJO hIzPkqMMRursY5a6NENouIPNliNhDZH24K7rzU82ClrEs/H1T8WUBdDIfQ0oar1+ n/jUk38q2PmqfsN9Pp56zhqKxTEp19Yv07pWMeOzyFFt2Oel155N8A+bHde2hQkC Yn80VgkRbi1COadlPMrG7BHRcXJPsEplsqDkv4P77qOarfQ19gIN3MBUwjCk8i1y XCjN5QItHHvvoWiWJYvh8JNZNolwOPaAs70+mOA3vTcEjdweAnkM2RNBWByOpUbS Bb+VpBQd0TFxzQcPRKR5P1GxYoPpaHfaRBc6aMH7w6zZ/Z3/L5y7bLadI1di89uT ilf3qXK7xpJQXg5FEAFx1xOBT1m9bXvSG2E/gCu39y7g1MJAzSSlPKBimjjs4sEu 04SoP8dxTeJEPpCrK8ZCY7HsIsh2+9cmQD9m5jxNVX1jOfGcxbBfCsr0pOqewVoq eeSeMnYqV5ygryrAb4WzK2WyQPhOatQW2EqGbANdkjOq4eDVFCFg27Kwu62DZunD NSY9AyolwlYB6hL5tn0S2cs6wkwTu0dHuMJ62pfvkcEFGIrayH93dUZmG2vXErn9 v2GqGc0OZjASVn40Td7N =ef2k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list Tech@cryptech.is https://lists.cryptech.is/listinfo/tech
