>From Howard Abrams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> In a "mature" freenet, all nodes will be full, all the time. > >Won't nodes be going up ( and down...) all the time? What about leaf >( or at least low peering ) nodes in the graph that don't get much data >requested >through them? > >While I agree many nodes up for a long period of time will "fill up", >there may >be room to optimize the storage. I think there was a plan to have new nodes get pre-filled with data from nearby nodes in 0.4, but I don't know if anything came of it... -- Benjamin Coates _______________________________________________ freenet-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tech
- [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Accessed Data Howard Abrams
- RE: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... Howard Abrams
- Re: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... Leo Howell
- Re: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... Rares Marian
- Re: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... Michael Rogers
- Re: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... Rares Marian
- Re: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... Mike Schiraldi
- Re: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... moritz
- Re: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... Michael Rogers
