On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 05:25:01PM -0700, Howard Abrams wrote: > Won't nodes be going up ( and down...) all the time? What about leaf > ( or at least low peering ) nodes in the graph that don't get much data > requested > through them? Thing is, it'll be the same nodes going up and down - so a full permanent node would overflow into a new leaf node which would quite likely vanish shortly after, and new permanent nodes would use up their free space quickly. -- Leo Howell M5AKW freenet:MSK@SSK@2vz8xnhEJyJOlBVNfBEOWaohQFEQAgE/freesite//
- [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Accessed Data Howard Abrams
- RE: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... Howard Abrams
- RE: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... Benjamin Coates
- Re: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... Leo Howell
- Re: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... Rares Marian
- Re: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... Michael Rogers
- Re: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... Rares Marian
- Re: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... Mike Schiraldi
- Re: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... moritz
- Re: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... Ian Clarke
- Re: [freenet-tech] Idea: Migrating Infrequently Acces... Michael Rogers
PGP signature