On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 03:02:14PM -0700, Mr. Bad wrote: > How about [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Sounds good to me - I can put a mention on the "Freenet Hams" section of Freesite (not that anyone reads it <grumble> ;-) Amateur networks could play a very important part of Freenet's resistance to government control - after all what good are thousands of nodes if there is no free infrastructure? Interesting times... -- Leo Howell M5AKW freenet:MSK@SSK@2vz8xnhEJyJOlBVNfBEOWaohQFEQAgE/freesite//
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ham I Am, Down With the Program D. R. Evans
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ham I Am, Down With the Program Mr . Bad
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ham I Am, Down With the Program Leo Howell
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ham I Am, Down With the Program Mr . Bad
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ham I Am, Down With the Program Leo Howell
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ham I Am, Down With the Program Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ham I Am, Down With the Program Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ham I Am, Down With the Program Mr . Bad
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ham I Am, Down With the Program Travis Bemann
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ham I Am, Down With the Program eric Kvam
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ham I Am, Down With the Program Mark J. Roberts
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ham I Am, Down With the Program Leo Howell
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ham I Am, Down With the Program moritz
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ham I Am, Down With the Program Paul McGregor
PGP signature