> Thanks for the move ;-)
No prob. I'm a newbie here so please forgive me.
>
> My point was that with untrusted code, only one request is enough to bring
a
> node to its knees. The code can run in an endless loop.
Ok for which other nodes are waiting. The other nodes could detrmine a
problem and distrbute the process elsewhere.
If I am correct in reading the freenet protocol, copies and duplicate files
are made all over as more requests for that file occur. So if one dup falls
out or is taken up by a cancer node. then the file can be goten elsewhere.
So could the process do the same. Again we have to detct cancer nodes. Of
course a cancer node could be very clever and get around cancer detectors.
But that node might not be selected agaian and again for processing due to
the random nature of freenet.
>
> Without untrusted code, you need a constant flood of requests to force a
> node into DOS.
This is bad???
Is this phrased poorly or am I not getting this.
Please explain.
HackerKungFu
_______________________________________________
freenet-tech mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tech
