> > Not a problem; just write a function that can scan any arbitrary piece of > > code and determine whether it will eventually halt or not. > > Right in other words, the freenet could determine cancer nodes and deal with > them. Ahm... I think you missed out on the irony in that statement... it is IMPOSSIBLE to write an algorithm that decides if a given piece of code will halt eventually (i think Turing proved that). I think you still don't understand the problem with the execution of untrusted code (is it so unobvious?). -Stefan _______________________________________________ freenet-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tech
- [freenet-tech] Ideas for a FreeNet Process JF
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ideas for a FreeNet Process Stefan Reich
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ideas for a FreeNet Process JF
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ideas for a FreeNet Process Stefan Reich
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ideas for a FreeNet Process Mike Schiraldi
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ideas for a FreeNet Process JF
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ideas for a FreeNet Process JF
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ideas for a FreeNet Process Stefan Reich
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ideas for a FreeNet Process Stefan Reich
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ideas for a FreeNet Process JF
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ideas for a FreeNet Process Stefan Reich
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ideas for a FreeNet Process JF
- RE: [freenet-tech] Ideas for a FreeNet Process Guy Smith
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ideas for a FreeNet Process JF
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ideas for a FreeNet Process JF
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ideas for a FreeNet Process Stefan Reich
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ideas for a FreeNet Process JF
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ideas for a FreeNet Process Mr . Bad
- Re: [freenet-tech] Ideas for a FreeNet Process JF
