Hi,
upon reading the paper on Freenet (by Ian Clarke, Oskar Sandberg,
Brandon Wiley, and Theodore W. Hong) (icsi-revised) I'm a bit confused
about the used anonimity terminology.
Stated is that , in Freenet, receiver anonymity is actually key
anonimity, because routing depends on knowledge of the key. I can go
along with that observation, if we're talking about packets going
downstream. But in my view, upstream packets are routed by means of the
transaction ID. Are we still talking about key anonimity here, while the
upstream messages are still going towards a receiver, but not towards a
node with a close 'key value'.
Please comment,
--nico
--
nico galoppo - tremelo/leuven, belgium
- baalsebaan 163, 3120 tremelo
---------------------------------------------------------------
[bash]:~$ man woman nico at crossbar dot net
No manual entry for woman debian linux :: vim powered
_______________________________________________
freenet-tech mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tech
