On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 03:34:38PM +0100, Nico Galoppo wrote:
> upon reading the paper on Freenet (by Ian Clarke, Oskar Sandberg,
> Brandon Wiley, and Theodore W. Hong) (icsi-revised) I'm a bit confused
> about the used anonimity terminology.
>
> Stated is that , in Freenet, receiver anonymity is actually key
> anonimity, because routing depends on knowledge of the key. I can go
> along with that observation, if we're talking about packets going
> downstream. But in my view, upstream packets are routed by means of the
> transaction ID. Are we still talking about key anonimity here, while the
> upstream messages are still going towards a receiver, but not towards a
> node with a close 'key value'.
I don't quite follow your argument, but I can assure you
it is the 'key value' that is used to route messages.
--
:: tavin cole ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ::
if there's been a way to build it
there'll be a way to destroy it
things are not all that out of control
- stereolab
_______________________________________________
freenet-tech mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tech
