--* Tavin Cole (Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 06:58:28AM -0500) *-- > On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 12:39:19PM +0100, Nico Galoppo wrote: > > I am working on a thesis around P2P anonimity. We're investigating the > > possibility of improving the anonimity characteristics of Freenet in > > particular. > > > > What are the opinions of the freenet developers on a pipenet-like > > 'frontend' to Freenet? Could it be a plausible extension to the basic > > Freenet, much in the same way as a 'mixnet' frontend has been proposed > > before. What could be the added benefits in providing a higher degree of > > anonimity, in particular for document inserters and retrievers? > > > > AnonNet is such a pipenet implementation, what we would like to do is > > integrate into the Freenet core. Could the existing Freenet PKI be used. > > What is its status anyway in the CVS code? > > > > All suggestions, remarks and questions are welcome, > > Can you explain more about pipenets and AnonNet in particular (maybe > some URLs)? I'm guessing it works at the transport layer, so in Fred > you would write an AnonNet transport (see freenet.transport.* -- right > now the only transports are TCP and SSL).
Here's the link to AnonNet: http://www.authnet.org/anonnet/ For information on the pipenet model, go to http://www.eskimo.com/~weidai/pipenet.txt I'm not sure where it would fit into Freenet. I'll have a look at the transport layer asap. --nico -- nico galoppo - tremelo/leuven, belgium - baalsebaan 163, 3120 tremelo --------------------------------------------------------------- [bash]:~$ man woman nico at crossbar dot net No manual entry for woman debian linux :: vim powered _______________________________________________ freenet-tech mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tech
