-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 02 March 2002 17:10, you wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Mar 2002, Jeff Darcy wrote:
> |> Was wondering if Freenet can be modified to be used to set up
> |> distributed file system. I have about 50 linux boxes with 30 Gigs free
> |> on each of them. Can Freenet be used like maybe a variation of clustered
> |> file system to set up a common resource pool ?
> |
> |Your files will only be accessible via the Freenet APIs, not via standard
> |filesystem open/close/read/write (or exec).  There will be no directory
> |structure or permissions.  There will be no data consistency.  If all of
> |those are fine with you, you can use Freenet for this.  Otherwise, you'd
> | be better off trying something like Coda or SFS.
>
> The perms aren't too much of a problem. I would want to use this 1500 GB
> odd of space for an internal FTP server anyway. The fact that the files
> will only be accessible thru the APIs could be a hitch. If its possible
> though, a Freenet-to-FTP translator could be written.

I belive somebody already did one, though I don't think he ever released it.

> How did you mean, 'there will be no data consistency' though ?

It means data disappears when you don't use it very often.

- -- 
X windows:  There's got to be a better way.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjyCpz0ACgkQqpueKcacfLTWnwCdFJRF5uQAtCZF3nxgY80DZZmw
GuEAoK2kVCeCUvR8dZs/plM1hAauvu6z
=WJIq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
freenet-tech mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tech

Reply via email to