toad wrote: > What's the difference between search failure, RNF and DNF? Search > failure is a timeout? If so, this is with throttling? There shouldn't be > _that_ many timeouts...
I think two messages I sent yesterday have been lost, at least I don't see them through Gmane. This run is without any throttling mechanism. In one of the lost messages it seemed that the collapse point was in the 6-8 range. About the failure meanings, I leave this to Michael to answer. I'll repost the messages now. > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 09:26:01PM +0100, Jano wrote: >> > Jano wrote: >> > >> >> About the purple line: these simulations die by OOM errors in the >> >> simulator. In particular, I guess you're concerned by the drop. I'd >> >> not give it any meaning, it's almost surely a partial execution. I'll >> >> take care to remove these wrong results next time. >> >> >> >> Nonetheless, I'm going to check it and come back to confirm. >> > >> > Mmmmm I was wrong. Some of these simulations are ending properly and >> > most request are failing with RNF. Even the ones dying because of OOM >> > show prevalence of RNF. I'm going to run a more detailed series in the >> > critical range where absence of balancing collapses. >> >> This is yet another run in the range 6..8/0.2, now without OOMs...
