On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 02:37:38PM +0000, Michael Rogers wrote: > Jano wrote: > > Thinking about this, we could perhaps slightly change the consumer model > > and, instead of generating ten events at once, generate one for the first > > reader and when it triggers, generate one event at a time for the next > > reader. This way we reduce by a factor of ten the pending events. > > Possibly... it depends on the use case again, I suppose. Your suggestion > sounds similar to the way things propagate through blogs, whereas the > current behaviour is more like a one-writer-many-readers model. > > I've committed some changes to SVN so the readers aren't informed until > after the search leaves the node's queue. That should keep the number of > pending events under control, but it will also change the shape of the > graphs, because the number of requests will be affected by throttling.
It's realistic though. Most people don't advertise their keys until they have been inserted. Well, okay, some do, but they're idiots. :) > > Cheers, > Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20061213/bffbd44d/attachment.pgp>
