On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 08:43:42PM +0000, Michael Rogers wrote:
> toad wrote:
> > I don't understand. Why is LIFO better?
> 
> I don't understand either - maybe because it favours new messages, which 
> are less likely to be redundant copies of messages that have already 
> reached their destinations? If that's true, it might also have lower 
> latency...
> 
> > Are you allowing *ALL* requests
> > to complete before reporting the result?
> 
> No, I'm taking a slice of the simulation in its steady state and 
> counting the number of messages sent and received in that slice.

If it is actually a steady state - is it?
> 
> Cheers,
> Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20061214/9dc7ace1/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to