On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 08:43:42PM +0000, Michael Rogers wrote: > toad wrote: > > I don't understand. Why is LIFO better? > > I don't understand either - maybe because it favours new messages, which > are less likely to be redundant copies of messages that have already > reached their destinations? If that's true, it might also have lower > latency... > > > Are you allowing *ALL* requests > > to complete before reporting the result? > > No, I'm taking a slice of the simulation in its steady state and > counting the number of messages sent and received in that slice.
If it is actually a steady state - is it? > > Cheers, > Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20061214/9dc7ace1/attachment.pgp>