On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 03:24:02PM +0000, Michael Rogers wrote: > Ken Snider wrote: > > Couldn't you just accomplish this with a FIFO queue of arbitrarily short > > depth or fixed lifetime per-queue-object? The would seem to gain you all > > the > > benefits of LIFO without the drawbacks mentioned by toad. > > A short FIFO queue for incoming searches would be similar to > token-passing, but tokens have the advantage that you know whether your > search will fit in the queue (because you have a token), so you can > avoid sending searches that will be dropped.
Right. A short FIFO queue for searches, plus some form of load propagation. > > Cheers, > Michael -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20061215/876f082c/attachment.pgp>
