>
> As I have stated on numerous occasions, the handshake traffic is not a
> serious problem.
>>

I agree this is a /very/ minor concern! I only raised it as a one  
potential up-side. Like I said, I think the time could be better  
spent, rather than doing this...

>>      This would increase the number of users who are accessible to those
>> who do not know their IP address. (These users can only access
>> someone who is properly port forwarded)
>
> 90%+ of nodes don't know their IP address when first installed,  
> because
> they are behind a router/NAT/PAT. UP&P and STUN let us find it. The
> problem with STUN is that it can probably be fingerprinted.  
> Additionally
> UP&P lets a NATed node which doesn't know its IP address connect to
> another node. Right now a new NATed node which doesn't know its IP
> address can only connect to a port forwarded node - this is a serious
> limitation to connectivity!
>>

Right! This is IMO, the main benefit UP&P allows. That was the point  
of my e-mail. I apologize for apparently not making my points clearer.
-Colin


Reply via email to