>
> Huh ? How comes you can't update using the auto-updater ? Why do you
> think we are releasing time-delayed self-mandatory builds ?
>

The Time-delayed builds aren't enough!
I understand you want to encourage people to upgrade, but it's not  
worth breaking them off from the network if they don't. That  
alienates users, and makes it more likely they'll just drop freenet  
entirely.

I think that a compromise, such as prioritizing any other requests,  
resulting in degraded performance, etc, is a much better idea.
If you don't like that, what about a different compromise?

Keep in mind our audience- If someone needs to publish an anonymous  
message, and Freenet is no longer willing to talk to his node, he's  
now stopped entirely.


>
> The problem is that not-up-to-date nodes AREN'T using the auto- 
> updater.
> And for nodes wich were off during the delay period, 'too bad' for  
> them
> :p ...

That's the difference- I don't want to screw the users, even if it  
helps the network. I understand it's an alpha, but your attitude is  
dangerous. If we can accomplish the same objective of not hurting the  
network by giving them slow connections, rather than ending their  
connections, we're better off.

I care about the people who use Freenet, and want to make things  
better for them.


> What we need is update-over mandatory support.
> https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=434

Forgive me if I've misunderstood, but are you really arguing for  
mandatory updating? If you make updating automatically mandatory, I  
cannot use freenet any longer. Most people I know feel the same way.  
Most slashdotters will agree.
Keep in mind, Freenet is a project for people who like their privacy-  
Those people don't take well to automatically running software on  
their PC.

I understand the reason you think auto-updating is the solution, but  
I think Mandatory builds are the problem.

That is user-hostile behavior- Essentially "Upgrade, or we won't let  
you talk to anyone who has."
That's Microsoft-style thinking ;)


Again, I hope I misunderstood. I'm just a user-advocate.

-Colin




> and for distro packages, maybe
> https://bugs.freenetproject.org/view.php?id=519
>
> NextGen$
> _______________________________________________
> Tech mailing list
> Tech at freenetproject.org
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech


Reply via email to