-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 11 May 2006, at 09:20, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Why not? Freemail uses acknowledgements; it may be slow, but it should > be reasonably reliable. And it's immune to traffic analysis, and far > more resistant to intersection attacks than e.g. a hypothetical > freenet > email system using 1:1 connections. And it makes integration of the > open > and the dark world of freenet via mailing list gateways far easier, > and > in particular it makes darknet development far easier. And it's > what is > asked for by e.g. Robert Guerra for human rights groups potentially > using Freenet. Well, I guess we could increase our projects to 5, hopefully Google won't think we are taking the piss, at this rate we will account for half of the total number of projects in the SoC.... Ian. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEY2xzQtgxRWSmsqwRAqa7AJ9YHn2ND3WGhMwCE+jRZAkgq/YduQCdGQnH 6FggHYX4Dg9tSX8/Yp5xuHc= =MSQs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
