On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:55:13AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11 May 2006, at 09:20, Matthew Toseland wrote: > >Why not? Freemail uses acknowledgements; it may be slow, but it should > >be reasonably reliable. And it's immune to traffic analysis, and far > >more resistant to intersection attacks than e.g. a hypothetical > >freenet > >email system using 1:1 connections. And it makes integration of the > >open > >and the dark world of freenet via mailing list gateways far easier, > >and > >in particular it makes darknet development far easier. And it's > >what is > >asked for by e.g. Robert Guerra for human rights groups potentially > >using Freenet. > > Well, I guess we could increase our projects to 5, hopefully Google > won't think we are taking the piss, at this rate we will account for > half of the total number of projects in the SoC....
Nmap had 10 last year. Jorrit said Crystal Space has 10 projects and 5-9 applications for each. > > Ian. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20060511/6094128d/attachment.pgp>
