> > I frankly don't see what's wrong with offering a monolithic installer, so > long as that target audience is within the scope of Freenet's target > audience. The offering of a monolithic installer does not preclude the > offering of any other type of installer. > > (My $0.02, after watching the list for three days after a good two year's > absence.) > > - Damian > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > Tech at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech >
I agree that a monolithic installer would be the most user-friendly, I was just saying *if* coding a new installer was a big ordeal, then a .zip file would be a quick solution. -- I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. - Voltaire
