On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 08:45:38AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 22 May 2006, at 01:23, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: > >I'm not sure that's a good idea. > > People would fake storing the data and would be given credit... > >As they already do on BT, Emule and others ;) > >Moreover, I'm not sure that making inserting more expensive is the > >way to > >go : they already are by design. > > Ok, so how do we handle inserts?
At present, they are sent more slowly, and they are far more likely to cause multiple backoffs than requests. > > Ian. -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20060522/39346925/attachment.pgp>
