-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 25 May 2006, at 09:29, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 09:10:14AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: >> >> Essentially I think the question is whether it is really such a bad >> thing if C can mislead its neighbors into thinking that it is >> inserting when it really isn't. What is the worst case scenario >> here? > > That all your inserts fail, and you don't know about it. This would require that: - You had chosen to trust someone that was dropping all your inserts - You were routing all inserts to that person To the extent that this is a problem, I think it is a problem outside the scope of load balancing. Ian. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEdeX+QtgxRWSmsqwRAgOLAJ9wjEa5Bo19aBRsgfeA48ZDGGpMagCeOM3i WrGX+OoJxSHnE/C5ocJUhMw= =1b/q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
