vive wrote: > I'm not claiming it will typically happen, but its good to experiment > with it to know some about how important clustering is.
True - I can't see how a constant supply of random positions would lead to greater clustering but I'm not saying it definitely wouldn't happen either! :-) > Should be correct directly after generated from Kleinbergs model. But what do > you mean with current locations? Referring here to the current locations on > the > circle, where closeness does not have to mean being close in the network after > having swapped and done destination sampling (where positions affect > swapping). > Is your suggestion to introduce nodes in roughly the same part of the network > where others just disappeared? Not necessarily - wherever the new node appears on the circle, isn't the important thing the relationship between its distance (on the circle) from other nodes and its probability of being connected to them? Why would the connections between the other nodes make a difference? Cheers, Michael
