On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 02:47:31PM +0200, vive wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 01:19:29PM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote: > > vive wrote: > > Here's a thought experiment: take a Kleinberg network and shuffle the > > locations. Then replace the nodes one by one with new nodes, using the > > current locations to calculate the connection probabilities. When all > > the nodes have been replaced, don't you have a Kleinberg network again? > > I claim you don't. It will be more alike a random graph. But indeed, if > you think so then try to simulate it. :)
I read your mail once again and I misunderstood what you meant here the first time. Yes, it should become a Kleinberg network again. (But I've not changed my mind on the other questions. :) regards, Vilhelm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/tech/attachments/20070820/381191c7/attachment.pgp>
