-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, 17 May 2008, Edgar Friendly <thelema314 at gmail.com> wrote: >Matthew Toseland wrote: >> That's completely different. Real time chat over Freenet, with both peers >> anonymised, is not currently feasible (well there are prototypes with ~ 15 >> second latency, but IMHO it will be slow and rely on some unreliable >> mechanisms...) > >Hmm, I wonder if freenet would be usable for a twitter-style >communication. Twitter's needs for "real-time" are much less, and the >broadcast nature of twitter might fit freenet's architecture. > >Just a quick thought.
Ah, but what would you call it? "FreeTwit"? Or better yet ... "TwitFree" (sorry, I simply couldn't resist) - -- My public keys can be found on my freenet site: SSK at TEx6TiaPeszpV4AFw3ToutDb49EPAgM/mytwocents/63//m2ckey.html (*NOTE* you must be running freenet for this link to be usefull) and on public keyservers. Key-Id: 0x92769D7E Fingerprint: 2F07D586C8D4EEA732711338CFEF46E592769D7E I can be reached either by the NiM form on the freesite or by Email: m2c AT nym.panta-rhei.eu.org Frost: MyTwoCents at Z+59LNK9NhMvxewYggENU4Ww50s On the 0.5 Freenet board -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: N/A iQA/AwUBSC8VVZ5/ZUtfDwnNEQJQxgCfcc8uvitY+sEYeYJS4rcDtiY4sWcAnjYK hbeV494E2QJhBgxJREA8csL9 =xNyM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
