Hei, On 06/25/2013 12:00 PM, [email protected] wrote: > ..sha256 is the one approved gold standard? In the EU too? > Norwegian "law enforcement" _evades_ this very issue whenever > I ask.
Gold standard for what exactly ? Which issue is Norwegian law enforcement evading ? >> > I most cases the companies / people bringing the device in question >> > into public are either completely unaware of the issue or try to >> > silently ignore it. Once they are made aware of it they pretty soon >> > resolve the issue without the need to fully proof all and everything. > > ..in my cases they play Kafka games litigating me, and prevail with > "Chad's Defense", because I don't have the money to hire lawyers. Forgive my ignorance, but what is a "Chad's Defense" ? >> > But there are surely also cases where the manufacturer simply denies >> > everything and then it will be super handy to have this tool! >> > >>> > > You have to keep in mind that automated tooling is just used to >>> > > gather evidence for a *possible* GPL violation. Why only "possible" violations ? When a file is binary equal to a GPL binary, it is proof for copying, isn't it ? > -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen Viele Grüße = Best regards, Matthias
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
