Hei,

On 06/25/2013 12:00 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> ..sha256 is the one approved gold standard?  In the EU too?  
> Norwegian "law enforcement" _evades_ this very issue whenever 
> I ask.

Gold standard for what exactly ?
Which issue is Norwegian law enforcement evading ?


>> > I most cases the companies / people bringing the device in question
>> > into public are either completely unaware of the issue or try to
>> > silently ignore it. Once they are made aware of it they pretty soon
>> > resolve the issue without the need to fully proof all and everything.
>
> ..in my cases they play Kafka games litigating me, and prevail with 
> "Chad's Defense", because I don't have the money to hire lawyers.

Forgive my ignorance, but what is a "Chad's Defense" ?


>> > But there are surely also cases where the manufacturer simply denies
>> > everything and then it will be super handy to have this tool!
>> > 
>>> > > You have to keep in mind that automated tooling is just used to
>>> > > gather evidence for a *possible* GPL violation.

Why only "possible" violations ?
When a file is binary equal to a GPL binary,
it is proof for copying, isn't it ?


> -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen

Viele Grüße = Best regards,
Matthias

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to