Hi Arnt, > > > ..in my cases they play Kafka games litigating me, and prevail > > > with "Chad's Defense", because I don't have the money to hire > > > lawyers. > > > > Forgive my ignorance, but what is a "Chad's Defense" ? > > ..you managed to miss it??? 8oD About half the list traffic on this > list ([email protected]) this spring, and the very reason > it is now moderated since April
No, not this list, `tech', but the `legal' one. > is why I'm looking for gold standards on checksums that can make it > thru litigation etc scrutiny all the way up to the supreme courts > around this planet. Why not move from SHA-1 to SHA-2 since space is presumably not an issue? It's likely to be considered even better if there's a chance SHA-1 is considered insufficient. See sha512sum(1) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sha512#Comparison_of_SHA_functions Cheers, Ralph.
