It's a fun fantasy, Arnt, but don't try it. When you start trying to directly enforce upon some insurance salesman who makes a casual sale of his motor vehicle and knows nothing of the source code in it, you just give us a bad reputation and send the common people to their congressman with complaints of copyright abuse.
So, instead you should tell the automotive parts manufacturer that they have to keep source code available for 20 years, because they are the only ones who can reasonably fulfill the source code distribution responsibilities of the vehicle owners. Arnt Karlsen <[email protected]> wrote: > >..hint ideas: "No source code with resold cars has no impact on >resale value?" Easily extendable to "Anyone who sells his 4 year \ >old Caddilac without source code loses his license to Linux!!!". >"And that again, has no impact on initial sales???" ;o) >"I'll chk back with the Toyota guys again..." etc. -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
