There is a client to admin from Windows hosts as well...

FYI
Eric

On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, Phil Pennock wrote:

> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 20:17:28 -0500
> From: Phil Pennock <[email protected]>
> To: Tom Perrine <[email protected]>
> Cc: LOPSA Technical Discussions <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [lopsa-tech] Apple Airport Extreme?
> 
> On 2011-01-06 at 16:42 -0800, Tom Perrine wrote:
>> Anyone want to share experiences with the Airport Extreme?  I'm thinking of
>> replacing an 8? year old first-gen WRT54.  I want to play some ipv6 games,
>> simplify the home net and get some G and N wireless at home.  The Airport
>> was recommended by someone who is already running v6 at home (tunneled), but
>> I want to get a wider view on value, reliability, etc.
>
> Requires a Mac client to admin; I had an earlier generation unit back
> when I had a macbook pro from work, but after I switched to a linux
> laptop for work (don't ask) I switched to a Linksys.  Bought a Macbook
> for myself last year, switched back to an Apple Airport Extreme, one of
> the newer ones.
>
> Mostly it just works.  The lack of ability to easily tcpdump on the
> outside interface is a pain, the lack of UPnP support might be an issue,
> depending upon what devices you have at home.  Or you might well choose
> to count that as a positive security feature.
>
> If using 6to4 for IPv6 connectivity then it will sporadically decide
> that there's a problem with the tunnel, turn the status light orange and
> cause a diagnostic pop-up on my Mac.  6to4 had issues, as did tunnels
> from both Hurricane Electric and SixXS (different issues each) so I
> ended up disabling IPv6 on the box, which is irritating.  I don't
> *think* any of the issues were caused by using an AAE, but I haven't
> done a swap-in replacement with an IPv6-capable WRT box at the times of
> problems to verify this, so it's just a lack of evidence, not proof.
>
> The modern units are simultaneous dual-band; when you compare prices
> with the competition, a year ago it was very favourable, but the
> competition has dropped in price.  In terms of just working, the AAE is
> great value.  I get decent signal-strength throughout the house.
>
> At the more sysadmin-orientated side of things:
> * Supports a separate guest network, but think that's wifi-only, so I
>   don't think you can set up a DMZ (but I've never tried, so I could be
>   wrong).
> * Supports remote syslog and SNMP (don't remember which MIBs are
>   present)
> * Lets you see the connected wifi clients together with dB s/n, which
>   is helpful
> * If you attach USB storage, it can *NOT* be used as a Time Machine
>   backup disk; supports AFP and CIFS, I think.  No NFS.  ISTR that, a
>   few years ago with the previous device, I had an external disk
>   attached, HFS+ formatted, shared and it worked with my wife's XP box
>   once I installed third-party FS drivers, but there was some
>   temperamentality there.
>
> I'm happy with mine and would only even consider replacing it with a
> custom setup running open firmware and my choice of OS; no way I'd be
> happy going back to any other vendor's stock image.
>
> Regards,
> -Phil
> _______________________________________________
> Tech mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
> This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
> http://lopsa.org/
>

_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to