On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:18:15AM -0600, Brodie, Kent wrote: > I can't speak for other products, but as a relatively new Isilon > customer, "works for me". Scales well. It's pricey, but you get what > you pay for. The onefs management interface is decent.
I'd agree Isilon is worth looking at. We looked at them, but we're at the other end of their comfort zone: we need a huge amount of NFSops (70,000+, mostly metadata ) and Isilon doesn't really benchmark well there (10 node cluster only got to about 35,000 ops/sec at a reasonable latency): http://www.spec.org/sfs2008/results/res2009q3/sfs2008-20090430-00116.html If you're mostly data-intensive they look like a solid fit. _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
