Hot Diggety! Dan Foster was rumored to have written: > > I'm still undecided, though with reasonable change control and cross > verification procedures, I think I'd probably find it to be an > acceptable risk for use of IPv6 NAT given needs.
*sigh* I _meant_ to say: IPv6 sans NAT... One of these days, we'll improve that brain-to-keyboard interface. ;) -Dan _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
