These are the headers my ISP's anti-spam inserts

   Sender: tech-boun...@lists.lopsa.org
   Errors-To: tech-boun...@lists.lopsa.org
   X-Message-Linecount: 157
   X-Connected-IP: 64.34.197.29:55449
   X-Body-Linecount: 12
   X-Message-Size: 9498
   X-Body-Size: 656
   X-Received-Count: 12
   X-Recipient-Count: 1
   X-Local-Recipient-Count: 1
   X-Local-Recipient-Defer-Count: 0
   X-Local-Recipient-Fail-Count: 0
   X-Spam-Score: -5.5
   X-Spam-Score-Int: -54
   X-Spam-Bar: -----
   X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system 
"d-spamless.aa.net.uk", has
     processed this message and it scored (-5.5 points).
      pts  rule name              description
     ---- ---------------------- 
--------------------------------------------------
     -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
                                 trust
                                 [64.34.197.29 listed in list.dnswl.org]
     -2.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender
      0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail
                                 domains are different
     -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD        Envelope sender domain matches handover relay 
domain
     -3.0 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                                 [score: 0.0083]
      0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not 
necessarily valid
      0.0 RCVD_NOT_IN_IPREPDNS   Sender not listed at
                                 http://www.chaosreigns.com/iprep/
      0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
      0.4 TXREP                  TXREP: Score normalizing based on sender's 
reputation



On 08/12/16 15:07, John Stoffel wrote:
Adam> I received the message, and there has *not* been any message
Adam> injected into the body regarding failing fraud detection checks.

Same here, I got the message and it had a ton of various headers, but
not that one.

Adam> On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (lopser) <
Adam> lop...@nedharvey.com> wrote:

Adam>     Before anything else, can any of you confirm that when you receive 
this
Adam>     message, there has or hasn't been a line injected into the message 
body
Adam>     saying "This sender failed our fraud detection checks..." at the 
beginning
_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
Tech@lists.lopsa.org
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to