On May 15, 2009, at 1:40 AM, Dave Close wrote:
> I've read the pros and cons. It works for me. I measure several
> thousand
> rejected messages on this basis every hour.
"rejected messages" is a crummy/useless metric. I can improve your
metric:
From:* REJECT
et voila, your rejected messages count goes up. :-)
The important metric is "how many USELESS messages" or "how many SPAM
messages" are rejected. And I would guess that you're rejecting some
valid mail that way. Especially if someone who is sending you mail is
doing greylisting....
Cheers,
D
_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
http://lopsa.org/
