() Yes, considering that it runs one of the largest, most popular wiki
() sites in the world (wikipedia) makes it a strong contendor right out of
() the gate. That doesn't mean it's perfect for any particular niche, but
() it is a strong point in its favor.
()
() Regarding how easy to setup and maintain - pretty easy..
Mediawiki's weak point appears to be ACLs if this is of concern
to the OP. I'm told by our folks running Mediawiki that it's
not easy to have pages that are readable by some only and not by
everyone; they ended up running a separate instance for a closed
user group. However it's perfectly fine for me as a user and
occasional contributor.
Ciao, Lobo
_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
http://lopsa.org/
